Evidence Hub

A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Zephyr Endobronchial Valve Treatment in Heterogeneous Emphysema (LIBERATE)

G. Criner, R. Sue, S. Wright, M. Dransfield, H. Rivas-Perez, T. Wiese, F. Sciurba, P. Shah et al.

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2018

190 participants · 338 citations

Abstract

Rationale: This is the first multicenter randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Zephyr Endobronchial Valve (EBV) in patients with little to no collateral ventilation out to 12 months. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Zephyr EBV in heterogeneous emphysema with little to no collateral ventilation in the treated lobe. Methods: Subjects were enrolled with a 2:1 randomization (EBV/standard of care [SoC]) at 24 sites. Primary outcome at 12 months was the &Dgr;EBV‐SoC of subjects with a post‐bronchodilator FEV1 improvement from baseline of greater than or equal to 15%. Secondary endpoints included absolute changes in post‐bronchodilator FEV1, 6‐minute‐walk distance, and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire scores. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 190 subjects (128 EBV and 62 SoC) were randomized. At 12 months, 47.7% EBV and 16.8% SoC subjects had a &Dgr;FEV1 greater than or equal to 15% (P < 0.001). &Dgr;EBV‐SoC at 12 months was statistically and clinically significant: for FEV1, 0.106 L (P < 0.001); 6‐minute‐walk distance, +39.31 m (P = 0.002); and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, −7.05 points (P = 0.004). Significant &Dgr;EBV‐SoC were also observed in hyperinflation (residual volume, −522 ml; P < 0.001), modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (−0.8 points; P < 0.001), and the BODE (body mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity) index (−1.2 points). Pneumothorax was the most…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 190 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free