Evidence Hub

Lateral Wedge Insoles for Reducing Biomechanical Risk Factors for Medial Knee Osteoarthritis Progression: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

John Bradley Arnold, Daniel X. Wong, Richard Keith Jones, Catherine Louise Hill, Dominic Thewlis

Arthritis Care & Research, 2015

534 participants · 72 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Lateral wedge insoles are intended to reduce biomechanical risk factors of medial knee osteoarthritis (OA) progression, such as increased knee joint load; however, there has been no definitive consensus on this topic. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to establish the within-subject effects of lateral wedge insoles on knee joint load in people with medial knee OA during walking. METHODS: Six databases were searched from inception until February 13, 2015. Included studies reported on the immediate biomechanical effects of lateral wedge insoles during walking in people with medial knee OA. Primary outcomes of interest relating to the biomechanical risk of disease progression were the first and second peak external knee adduction moment (EKAM) and knee adduction angular impulse (KAAI). Eligible studies were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Eighteen studies were included with a total of 534 participants. Lateral wedge insoles resulted in a small but statistically significant reduction in the first peak EKAM (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.19; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] -0.23, -0.15) and second peak EKAM (SMD -0.25; 95% CI -0.32, -0.19) with a low level of heterogeneity (I(2) = 5% and 30%, respectively). There was a favorable but small reduction in the KAAI with lateral wedge insoles (SMD -0.14; 95% CI -0.21, -0.07, I(2) = 31%). Risk of methodologic bias scores (quality index) ranged from 8 to 13 out of 16.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 534 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free