Evidence Hub

Experimental, Theoretical, and In Silico Studies of Potential CDC7 Kinase Inhibitors

Kannika Byadarahalli Ravindranath, Saravanan Kandasamy, Hossam Ebaid, Jameel Al‐Tamimi, Sanjeev Murthy Talya Narasimhamurthy, N. Manju, Ahmad Hosseinizadeh, S. Madan Kumar

ACS Omega, 2024

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide In this work, we present the synthesis, solid-state characterization, and in silico studies of two pyrazole derivatives: 5-(2-methylphenoxy)-3-methyl-1-phenyl-1 H -pyrazole-4-carbaldehyde (I) and 5-(4-methylphenoxy)-3-methyl-1-phenyl-1 H -pyrazole-4-carbaldehyde (II). The molecular crystal properties, in terms of intermolecular hydrogen bonds and other weak interactions, are analyzed using single crystal X-ray diffraction. The Hirshfeld surfaces computational method is used to quantify the intermolecular interactions, density functional theory for theoretical structural optimization, and its comparison with the experimental structure and in-silico studies using docking and molecular dynamics studies of I and II with CDC7-kinase. In addition, the quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM) approach is applied to calculate the topological properties of electron density and the Laplacian of electron density of the chemical bonds of both molecules. Compounds I and II crystallize in a monoclinic crystal system, and molecules are connected via C–H···O intermolecular hydrogen bonds. Hirshfeld surfaces analysis revealed that the H···H type intercontact contributes more toward the crystal packing. DFT-optimized structures show a perfect overlay with the experimental structures. The in silico results show that both I (−41.50 kcal/mol) and II (−44.53 kcal/mol) exhibit strong binding free energies as ligands binding to the active sites…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a simulation / modelling, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free