Evidence Hub

A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Neurofeedback on Depression

Demir Barlas

NeuroRegulation, 2021

3 citations

Abstract

This meta-analytical study examined the effect of neurofeedback on decreasing depression. The main finding of the meta-analysis was that neurofeedback resulted in a large (g = -0.91) decrease in depression. This finding can be explained through the various roles of brainwave oscillations in terms of both the formation and persistence of depression and the development of oscillatory patterns less compatible with depressive states. One plausible mechanism for NF’s depression-reduction effect is that of the approach-withdrawal model as related to not only the asymmetrical activation of the frontal regions but also the hypoactivity of the amygdala. Future research might uncover other possible explanations for NF’s observed efficacy as a means of reducing depression. The findings of the study provide some support for the utilization of neurofeedback as either a complement to the pharmaceutical treatment of depression or, given its effect size, a standalone therapy. However, because NF research base is immature in comparison to the research base on pharmaceutical antidepressants, additional analysis remains necessary.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free