Evidence Hub

Tissue Mimicking Phantoms for Biomedical Optics: A Systematic Review of Inverse Adding–Doubling Characterization and Clinical Relevance

Elvis Anyel García-Cortés, Luís M. Oliveira, Julio César Pérez-Sansalvador, Teresita Spezzia‐Mazzocco

Journal of Biophotonics, 2026

Abstract

ABSTRACT Tissue mimicking phantoms are essential for calibration and clinical translation of biophotonic techniques. Although the inverse adding–doubling (IAD) method is widely regarded as a reference standard for determining absorption and reduced scattering coefficients, significant inter‐laboratory variability persists due to differences in integrating‐sphere configurations, loss‐compensation strategies, and model assumptions. This PRISMA‐guided review (2015–2025) analyzes 10 experimental studies and proposes a unified comparison framework based on scattering power‐law parameters to relate phantom fabrication to clinically relevant optical targets. Nonlinear regression of continuous spectra shows that selected PVC plastisol formulations reproduce dermal‐like scattering slopes and that the power‐law model provides consistent spectral descriptions (). By linking measurement methodology, spectral fitting, and mapping in space, this work provides a practical framework to interpret variability and guide development of tissue‐equivalent phantoms for reliable calibration of biophotonic devices.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free