Quantum for good through a lens of technosolutionism: A critical-constructive view
Abstract
‘Quantum for Good’ (Q4G) has emerged as a guiding rationale for quantum technology development, emphasising its potential to address societal challenges and serve the public good. Through this normative ambition, Q4G echoes the language of responsible innovation. At the same time, using technology to address complex social problems has been critiqued as ‘technosolutionism’—the belief that technology is an effective means to solve non-technological problems. In this paper, we examine whether and how this critique applies to Q4G. We adopt a principally neutral perspective on technosolutionism, recognising both the potential and limits of technological solutions, and use this as a critical-constructive lens to assess the normative underpinnings of Q4G. Specifically, we develop a set of guiding questions to scrutinise the ethical dimensions of proposed technosolutions and apply this framework to Q4G. We argue that, to live up to its commitment to societal good and to avoid becoming a legitimising narrative for existing innovation agendas or reducing complex issues to technosolutionist challenges, Q4G must remain attentive to the moral and sociopolitical dimensions of the problems it targets and the solutions it advances.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Quantum dots: synthesis, bioapplications, and toxicity
- A Guide to In Silico Drug Design
- Quantum Computing for Healthcare: A Review
- Automated in Silico Design of Homogeneous Catalysts
- Identification of Novel 3-Hydroxy-pyran-4-One Derivatives as Potent HIV-1 Integrase Inhibitors Using in silico Structure-Based Combinatorial Library Design Approach
- In silico structural elucidation of RNA-dependent RNA polymerase towards the identification of potential Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus inhibitors
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.