Evidence Hub

Optimizing radiotherapy in unresectable or metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature

Lee IJ, Bang JI, Choi SH, Im JH

Radiation oncology (London, England), 2025

1,792 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the role of radiotherapy (RTx) in patients with unresectable or metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

Methods: A systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was conducted to identify relevant studies published before November 2024. Meta-analyses were performed to assess the median overall survival (OS), 1- and 2-year OS rates, and local control (LC) rates in patients with unresectable or metastatic ICC treated with RTx. For studies reporting hazard ratios (HR), OS was compared between patients receiving chemotherapy (CTx) with RTx versus CTx alone and between dose-escalated and conventional-dose RTx. The toxicity outcomes of the included studies were systematically reviewed.

Results: Nine articles (n = 1,792) were included in the analysis. Pooled analysis revealed a median OS of 15.59 months, with 1-year and 2-year OS rates of 69% and 38%, respectively. The one- and 2-year LC rates were 79% and 55%, respectively. Four studies comparing CTx with RTx versus CTx alone revealed that the combination group had significantly improved OS (HR, 0.67). Additionally, dose-escalated RTx was associated with better OS than conventional-dose RTx (HR, 0.53). Grade ≥ 3 gastrointestinal toxicity occurred in 3.7% of patients, and grade 5 toxicity was rare (0.3%).

Conclusions: RTx, particularly with dose escalation or in combination with CTx, may provide survival benefits with acceptable toxicity,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,792 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free