Evidence Hub

Beyond the hype: an empirical assessment of quantum computing in bioinformatics

Manuel Arcieri, Paolo Zuliani, G. Carotenuto, Meryam Carrus, Tiziana Castrignanò

Frontiers in High Performance Computing, 2026

Abstract

Quantum computing offers great potential for solving intractable computational challenges in bioinformatics, yet the existing literature remains dominated by speculative proposals rather than empirical evidence. To separate theoretical promise from practical reality, this review systematically assesses the empirical state of quantum computing applications across biological domains. We analyzed fifty-three experimental studies spanning sequence analysis, structural biology, phylogenetics, and biomedical machine learning, evaluating them based on their underlying computational paradigms, dataset scales, comparisons against classical baselines, and adherence to open-science reproducibility standards. Our investigation reveals that, while all comparative studies report performance that matches or exceeds that of classical methods, the vast majority rely on simulated environments or quantum-inspired classical heuristics rather than on physical quantum hardware. Moreover, nearly 77% of the evaluated implementations are restricted to heavily reduced toy datasets due to current technological constraints. Severe reproducibility issues plague the field, with just 30% of the studies providing both publicly accessible source code and experimental data. Although quantum bioinformatics has successfully produced viable proof-of-concept prototypes, the field is fundamentally limited by hardware scaling bottlenecks and a lack of standardized benchmarking. To move from conceptual…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a review, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free