Evidence Hub

Understanding Cyclists' Visual Behavior Using Eye-Tracking Technology: A Systematic Review

Kchour F, Cafiso S, Pappalardo G

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024

1 citation

Abstract

Eye-tracking technologies are emerging in research aiming to understand the visual behavior of cyclists to improve their safety. These technologies gather real-time information to reveal what the cyclists look at and how they respond at a specific location and time. This systematic review investigates the use of eye-tracking systems to improve cyclist safety. An extensive search of the SCOPUS and WoS databases, following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, found 610 studies published between 2010 and 2024. After filtering these studies according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 25 were selected for final review. The included studies were conducted in real traffic or virtual environments aiming to assess visual attention, workload, or hazard perception. Studies focusing on other types of road users or participants not involved in active cycling were excluded. Results reveal the important impact of road elements' design, traffic density, and weather conditions on cyclists' gaze patterns. Significant visual workload is imposed mainly by intersections. Along with the valuable insights into cyclist safety, potential biases related to small sample sizes and technological limitations were identified. Recommendations for future research are discussed to address these challenges through more diverse samples, advanced technologies, and a greater focus on peripheral vision.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free