Evidence Hub

Strategies to Augment the Cardiovascular System and Acutely Enhance Exercise Performance in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Scoping Review

Hodgkiss DD, Balthazaar SJT, Gee CM, Chiou SY, Lucas SJE, Nightingale TE

Sports medicine - open, 2025

Abstract

Background: Spinal cord injury (SCI) affects motor and autonomic functions that reduce exercise capacity. Specifically, the loss of sympathetic drive following SCI at or above the sixth thoracic segment (≥ T6) can impair cardiovascular responses to exercise. This systematic scoping review aimed to identify ergogenic strategies that may augment the cardiovascular system and acutely enhance exercise performance in individuals with SCI.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science) from inception to 1st April 2025. Studies were included if they met the following eligibility criteria: (1) human participants (aged ≥ 16 years); (2) any acquired SCI (traumatic, infection, cancer); (3) any sample size but must be > 80% SCI; (4) acute, single, volitional exercise sessions with cross-over design (i.e., ergogenic strategy and control sessions); (5) report a measurable exercise performance outcome, and (6) the strategy used to enhance performance must have a theoretical effect on the cardiovascular system. Data were extracted from eligible studies and charted. Hedges' g summary effect sizes were calculated to quantify the magnitude of effects across strategies.

Results: A total of 7266 possible articles were identified. Following a full-text review, 32 articles were included. Findings were reported by strategy, defined as either mechanical (e.g., abdominal binders, lower-body compression, passive leg exercise and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free