Evidence Hub

Advances in Machine Learning-Driven Heart Disease Prediction: A Systematic Review

T. B, K. Karuppasamy

2025 4th International Conference on Automation, Computing and Renewable Systems (ICACRS), 2025

Abstract

Heart disease remains a major global health concern and one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. The growing availability of clinical datasets, electronic health records, and biomedical signals has led to increased adoption of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methods for early diagnosis and risk prediction. This review synthesizes recent advancements in ML-based heart disease prediction, drawing on contemporary studies that examine classical ML algorithms, hybrid approaches, deep architectures, and explainable AI techniques. The review outlines commonly employed data sources, preprocessing strategies, and evaluation metrics, and highlights the strengths and limitations of state-of-the-art models. A detailed research gap analysis identifies constraints such as limited generalizability, lack of multi-modal integration, data imbalance, and insufficient clinical validation. The paper concludes with future research directions, including federated learning, IoT-enabled real-time monitoring, quantum-enhanced models, and clinically interpretable AI systems. Overall, this review provides consolidated insights into the evolving role of machine learning in supporting early and accurate heart disease prediction.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free