Evidence Hub

A Systematic Review on Effectiveness and Contributions of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods in Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Classifications

J. J, S. Haw, Naveen Palanichamy, E. Anaam, Senthil Kumar Thillaigovindhan

International Journal of Computing and Digital Systems, 2025

8 citations

Abstract

: In the present scenario of people’s health, lung tumour is the major reason of cancer-related losses, and its death rates are steadily rising. Several researchers have developed automated techniques for quickly and accurately predicting the development of cancer cells using medical imaging and machine learning techniques. As advances in computerized systems have been made, deep learning techniques have been thoroughly investigated to aid in understanding the results of computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) and computer-aided detection (CADe) in computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and X-ray for the identification of lung cancer. To provide a thorough review of the deep learning methods created for lung cancer diagnosis and detection, this study is being done. The present study o ff ers an articulation of deep learning and machine learning methods and aims for applications in the diagnosis of lung cancer as well as an analysis of the advancements made in the techniques explored. In order to detect and screen for lung cancer, two main deep learning techniques are used in this study: analysis and categorization across the internal and external organizational environment and its markets. The benefits and drawbacks of the deep learning models that are currently in use will also be covered. Deep Learning technologies can deliver accurate and e ffi cient computer-assisted lung tumor detection and diagnosis, as shown by the subsequent analysis of the scan data.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free