Evidence Hub

Relative effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccine against hospitalizations and mortality according to Charlson Comorbidity Index: A post-hoc analysis of the DANFLU-1 randomized trial

Bernholm KF, Johansen ND, Espersen C, Modin D, Hyldekær KJ, Nealon J, Samson S, Loiacono MM et al.

European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2026

12,477 participants

Abstract

Purpose: The DANFLU-1 trial suggested lower incidence of hospitalizations for pneumonia and influenza, respiratory disease and all-cause mortality among older adults receiving high-dose (HD-IV) versus standard-dose (SD-IV) influenza vaccine. This study assessed the relative effectiveness of HD-IV versus SD-IV according to comorbidity in elderly individuals.

Methods: This was a post-hoc analysis of the DANFLU-1 randomized controlled feasibility trial of HD-IV versus SD-IV conducted during the 2021-2022 influenza season in adults aged 65-79 years. Outcomes assessed included influenza-related, respiratory, and cardiovascular hospitalizations, and mortality. We tested for effect modification by level of the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) using ICD-10 codes up to 10 years prior to randomization.

Results: Of the 12,477 randomly assigned participants (mean age 71.7 ± 3.9 years, 47.1% female), 8,020 (64.3%) had CCI = 0, 3,560 (28.5%) had CCI = 1-2 and 893 (7.2%) had CCI ≥ 3. When comparing HD-IV with SD-IV, hazard ratios of hospitalizations for pneumonia and influenza were similar across CCI groups (HR [95%CI]: 0.15 [0.03-0.68] for CCI = 0, 0.36 [0.11-1.15] for CCI = 1-2, 1.00 [0.25-4.00] for CCI ≥ 3). Comparable patterns were found for hospitalizations for respiratory disease (0.46 [0.17-1.20] for CCI = 0, 0.67 [0.32-1.39] for CCI = 1-2, 0.66 [0.24-1.87] for CCI ≥ 3) and all-cause mortality (0.28 [0.09-0.86] for CCI = 0, 0.70 [0.30-1.63] for CCI = 1-2, 0.57 [0.24-1.36] for CCI ≥…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 12,477 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free