Evidence Hub

Relative Effectiveness of High-Dose Versus Standard-Dose Influenza Vaccination Against Hospitalizations and Deaths According to Frailty Score: A Post Hoc Analysis of the DANFLU-1 Randomized Trial

Espersen C, Johansen ND, Modin D, Janstrup KH, Nealon J, Samson S, Loiacono MM, Harris RC et al.

The Journal of infectious diseases, 2026

12 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: Frailty is a risk factor for adverse influenza-related outcomes. We assessed the effectiveness of high-dose inactivated influenza vaccination (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccination (SD-IIV) according to a frailty score.

Methods: This was a post hoc analysis of the randomized feasibility trial of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV conducted during the 2021-2022 influenza season in older adults aged 65-79 years. We assessed prespecified outcomes, including hospitalizations and deaths, as first and recurrent events. Frailty was defined according to the hospital frailty risk score (HFRS).

Results: Among 12 477 included participants (mean age, 71.7 years; 47.1% female), 10 689 (85.7%) were categorized as having low frailty (HFRS <5) and 1784 (14.3%) had intermediate or high frailty (HFRS ≥5). HD-IIV versus SD-IIV was associated with a lower risk of first and recurrent hospitalizations for pneumonia or influenza regardless of the HFRS. For participants with low frailty there were 22 events (hazard ratio [HR], 0.37 [95% confidence interval, .15-.96]) and 25 recurrent events (incidence rate ratio, 0.31 [.11-.84]), and for those with intermediate or high frailty there were 16 events (HR, 0.33 [.11-1.01]) and 18 recurrent events (incidence rate ratio, 0.28 [.09-.92]; P value for continuous interaction with HFRS [Pinteraction] = .92 for first and Pinteraction = .93 for recurrent events). The HFRS modified the association of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV with all-cause…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 12 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free