Evidence Hub

High-dose vs. standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine and cardiovascular outcomes in persons with or without pre-existing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: the DANFLU-2 trial

Pareek M, Johansen ND, Modin D, Loiacono MM, Harris RC, Dufournet M, Larsen CS, Larsen L et al.

European heart journal, 2025

285 participants · 7 citations

Abstract

Background and aims: The aim was to evaluate and compare the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) vs. standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccination (SD-IIV) on respiratory and cardiovascular outcomes in persons with or without pre-existing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).

Methods: A prespecified exploratory analysis of a pragmatic, open-label, individually randomized trial conducted in Denmark during three influenza seasons. Adults ≥65 years were randomized 1:1 to HD-IIV or SD-IIV. Baseline and outcome data were collected through nationwide registries. The primary outcome was hospitalization for influenza or pneumonia. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, hospitalization for myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for stroke. Heterogeneity in rVE among participants with vs. without ASCVD was assessed.

Results: The incidence of all outcomes was higher in participants with pre-existing ASCVD (n = 46 825) vs. those without (n = 285 613). rVE was consistent among participants with and without ASCVD (all Pinteraction ≥ .05). The rVE for the primary outcome was 6.87% [95% confidence interval (CI), -2.52 to 15.42] among individuals without ASCVD and 4.71% (95% CI, -11.58 to 18.63) in those with (Pinteraction = .80). For influenza hospitalizations, the rVE was 42.88% (95% CI, 22.07-58.44) vs. 45.73% (95% CI, 16.68-65.16) in those without vs. with ASCVD (Pinteraction = .84). For MACE,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 285 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free