Evidence Hub

Effect of nocturnal oxygen therapy on exercise performance of COPD patients at 2048 m: data from a randomized clinical trial

Gutweniger S, Latshang TD, Aeschbacher SS, Huber F, Flueck D, Lichtblau M, Ulrich S, Hasler ED et al.

Scientific reports, 2021

8 citations

Abstract

This trial evaluates whether nocturnal oxygen therapy (NOT) during a stay at 2048 m improves altitude-induced exercise intolerance in lowlanders with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). 32 lowlanders with moderate to severe COPD, mean ± SD forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration (FEV1) 54 ± 13% predicted, stayed for 2 days at 2048 m twice, once with NOT, once with placebo according to a randomized, crossover trial with a 2-week washout period at 2), CTO and minute ventilation ([Formula: see text]) at 490 m were: SpO2 92 ± 1%, CTO 65 ± 1%, [Formula: see text] 37.7 ± 2.0 L/min; at 2048 m with placebo: SpO2 85 ± 1%, CTO 61 ± 1%, [Formula: see text] 40.6 ± 2.0 L/min and with NOT: SpO2 84 ± 1%; CTO 61 ± 1%; [Formula: see text] 40.6 ± 2.0 L/min (P 2, CTO at 2048 m with placebo vs. 490 m; P = NS, NOT vs. placebo). Altitude-related hypoxemia and cerebral hypoxia impaired exercise endurance in patients with moderate to severe COPD and were not prevented by NOT.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free