Evidence Hub

Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Computed Tomography in Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Kai Chen, Z. Niu, Run-Sen Jin, Q. Nie, Xian Gong, Ming-Yuan Du, Benyuan Jiang, Bin Zheng et al.

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2024

191 participants · 11 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Thoracoscopic segmentectomy is the recommended treatment option for small peripheral pulmonary nodules. To assess the ability of preoperative 3D reconstruction CT to shorten the operative time and improve perioperative outcomes in thoracoscopic segmentectomy compared with standard chest CT, we conducted this randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

The DRIVATS study was a multicentre, randomized controlled trial conducted in three hospitals between July 2019 and November 2023. Patients with small peripheral pulmonary nodules not reaching segments borders were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 3D reconstruction CT or standard chest CT before thoracoscopic segmentectomy. The primary end-point was operative time. The secondary end-points included incidence of postoperative complications, intraoperative blood loss and operative accident event.

RESULTS

A total of 191 patients were enrolled in this study: 95 in the 3D reconstruction CT group and 96 in the standard chest CT group. All patients underwent thoracoscopic segmentectomy except for one patient in the standard chest CT group who received a wedge resection. There is no significant difference in operative time between the 3D reconstruction CT group (median, 100 min [IQR, 85-120]) and the standard chest CT group (median, 100 min [IQR, 81-140]) (P = 0.82). Only one intraoperative complication occurred in the standard chest CT group. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of postoperative…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 191 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free