Evidence Hub

Long-term hemodynamic changes and blood pressure in atherosclerotic major cerebral artery disease

Yamauchi H, Kagawa S, Takahashi M, Higashi T

Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 2019

89 participants

Abstract

In patients with major cerebral artery disease, lower blood pressure might reduce blood flow in the collateral pathways, thereby impairing the growth of cerebral collaterals, inhibiting hemodynamic improvement. We evaluated the hemodynamic status twice using positron emission tomography and 15O-gas, over time, in 89 medically treated patients with atherosclerotic internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery disease that had no ischemic episodes during follow-up (mean, 28 ± 23 months). Changes in the mean hemispheric values of hemodynamic parameters in the territory of the diseased artery at follow-up were correlated with the mean blood pressure values at the baseline and follow-up examinations. There was a positive linear relationship between the degree of hemodynamic improvement and systolic blood pressure. Patients with low systolic blood pressure (<130 mmHg) ( n = 18) showed hemodynamic deterioration as indicated by significant decreases in cerebral blood flow, cerebral blood flow/cerebral blood volume ratio, and increases in oxygen extraction fraction during follow-up. In contrast, there were no significant changes in patients without low systolic blood pressure. In patients with atherosclerotic internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery disease and no ischemic episodes of stroke during follow-up, lower systolic blood pressure was associated with lesser hemodynamic improvement.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 89 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free