Evidence Hub

Robotic-Assisted Computed Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Bone Procedures: A Prospective Multicenter Pilot Study

Bonnet B, Stacoffe N, Dassa M, Tselikas L, Beunon P, Tutton S, Pialat JB, Milot L et al.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2026

6 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the feasibility, safety, and targeting accuracy of robotic-assisted CT-guided percutaneous bone procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective multicenter pilot study included adult patients undergoing CT-guided percutaneous bone consolidation or tumor ablation between September 2024 and January 2025 at three academic institutions. All procedures were planned and performed using the Epione® robotic platform. Targets included the thoracic and lumbar spine and the pelvis. The primary endpoint was feasibility of robotic-assisted needle insertion, defined as successful needle placement without conversion to manual technique. Secondary endpoints included safety, targeting accuracy, procedural time, and radiation dose. Targeting accuracy was measured as lateral tip deviation and angular deviation between planned and final needle positions.

RESULTS: Thirty-four patients underwent 90 needle insertions, including 66 in the spine (73.3%) and 24 in the pelvis (26.7%). Indications were bone consolidation in 87/90 insertions (97%) and tumor ablation in 3/90 (3%). Robotic insertion was feasible in 89/90 insertions (98.9%). Seven adverse events occurred in 6 patients (17.6%), including four serious events, none related to the device or procedure. Mean lateral tip deviation was 2.0 ± 1.4 mm, and mean angular deviation was 3.1° ± 2.7°. Mean dose-length product was 3224 ± 2215 mGy.cm. Mean total procedure time was 03 h 09 min ± 50 min.

CONCLUSIONS:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 6 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free