Evidence Hub

A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial on the Efficacy and Safety of Eucalyptol, Limonene, and Pinene Enteric Capsules in the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps Postoperatively

Yutong Sima, Jian-Feng Liu, Jin-Feng Liu, Gang Zheng, Yi Yang, Xiao-Lin Peng, Yan Qi, Xiao-Wei Wang et al.

Clinical and Translational Allergy, 2025

174 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Eucalyptol, limonene, and pinene enteric capsules (ELP) are typical mucoactive drugs used in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). However, reliable evidence regarding its efficacy in this population remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of ELP, particularly on nasal ciliary function and inflammatory biomarkers. Methods This prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical study enrolled CRSwNP patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Participants were randomly assigned at a 1:2 ratio to the intranasal corticosteroid (INCS) group or the ELP + INCS group. Clinical outcomes were assessed over 12 weeks using sinus computed tomography, nasal endoscopy, saccharin tests (STs) and the 22‐item sinonasal outcome tests (SNOT‐22). Local inflammation in nasal secretions were quantified via a Luminex assay, and adverse effects (AEs) was monitored throughout the study period. Results A total of 174 CRSwNP patients were included in the final analysis. Compared to the INCS group, the ELP + INCS group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in Lund‐Mackay score (LMS) and Lund‐Kennedy score (LKS) (p = 0.029 and 0.025, respectively). A higher proportion of patients in the ELP + INCS group also showed improvement in the runny nose score (weeks 8 and 12), cough score (week 4), and frustration score (week 8). Furthermore, STT was significantly shorter in the ELP + INCS group at week 4 (p =…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 174 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free