Evidence Hub

Randomized controlled clinical trial comparing guided bone regeneration of peri-implant defects with soft-type block versus particulate bone substitutes. 6-month results of hard tissue changes

G. Benic, S. Bienz, Young W. Song, Jae-Kook Cha, C. Hämmerle, U. Jung, R. Jung

Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 2022

40 participants · 33 citations

Abstract

AIM

To test whether soft-type block bone substitute used for guided bone regeneration (GBR) of peri-implant defects leads to different dimension of the augmented hard tissue than particulate bone substitute.

MATERIAL & METHODS

In 40 patients, 40 two-piece dental implants were placed >2 months after tooth extraction. Following random allocation, 20 peri-implant bone dehiscences were grafted with a soft-type block made of synthetic biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) + collagen and 20 bone dehiscences with particulate BCP. All the sites were covered with a collagen membrane stabilized with titanium pins. Immediately after wound closure and after 6 months, the horizontal dimension (HD) of the augmented hard tissue was measured at the level of implant shoulder using cone beam computed tomography. During re-entry at 6-months, the defect fill was clinically assessed.

RESULTS

At 6 months, the median HD measured 1.15 mm (mean: 1.31) in the soft-block group and 0.93 mm (mean: 1.05 mm) in the particulate group (p = 0.6). At 6 months, 7.1% of contained defects and 61.9% of non-contained defects showed an incomplete vertical defect fill.

CONCLUSIONS

Soft-type block of BCP + collagen used for GBR of peri-implant defects did not differ from particulate BCP regarding the dimension of the augmented hard tissue after 6 months of healing. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 40 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free