Evidence Hub

Secure and federated genome-wide association studies for biobank-scale datasets

Cho H, Froelicher D, Chen J, Edupalli M, Pyrgelis A, Troncoso-Pastoriza JR, Hubaux JP, Berger B

Nature genetics, 2025

410,000 participants · 20 citations

Abstract

Sharing data across institutions for genome-wide association studies (GWAS) would enhance the discovery of genetic variation linked to health and disease1,2. However, existing data-sharing regulations limit the scope of such collaborations3. Although cryptographic tools for secure computation promise to enable collaborative analysis with formal privacy guarantees, existing approaches either are computationally impractical or do not implement current state-of-the-art methods4-6. We introduce secure federated genome-wide association studies (SF-GWAS), a combination of secure computation frameworks and distributed algorithms that empowers efficient and accurate GWAS on private data held by multiple entities while ensuring data confidentiality. SF-GWAS supports widely used GWAS pipelines based on principal-component analysis or linear mixed models. We demonstrate the accuracy and practical runtimes of SF-GWAS on five datasets, including a UK Biobank cohort of 410,000 individuals, showcasing an order-of-magnitude improvement in runtime compared to previous methods. Our work enables secure collaborative genomic studies at unprecedented scale.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 410,000 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free