Evidence Hub

Mechanistic Insights into the Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Diagnosis and Management of Multiple Sclerosis

Minagar A, Sahraian M

Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology, 2026

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, immune-mediated demyelinating disease of the central nervous system whose heterogeneous clinical, radiological, and biological course has long resisted precise individual-level prediction. The recent convergence of large longitudinal datasets, advanced computational methods, and increasingly informative biomarkers has created conditions in which artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can begin to address that problem substantively. This review surveys the current evidence for AI/ML applications across the MS care continuum, with particular focus on the literature from 2022 through early 2026. Nine domains are examined: automated MRI lesion segmentation and quantification, fluid biomarker interpretation, unsupervised disease subtyping, disability progression prediction, treatment response stratification, drug repurposing and molecular discovery, digital biomarker monitoring, mechanistic interpretability, and integrated clinical management protocols. Notable recent contributions include the SuStaIn-based identification of two biologically distinct MS trajectories distinguished by early versus late serum neurofilament light chain elevation, the MindGlide deep learning platform enabling longitudinal analysis of archived routine clinical MRI data, the T-cell morphological classifier predicting natalizumab treatment response before drug initiation, and the fenebrutinib Phase III program that produced the first Bruton's tyrosine…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a review, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free