Evidence Hub

Ascorbate for Organ Dysfunction in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis: The Phase 2b ASTER Trial

Files DC, Matthay MA, Ware LB, Brower RG, Aggarwal NR, Brown SM, Chang SY, Douglas IS et al.

CHEST critical care, 2025

79 participants

Abstract

Background: A phase 2 trial of high-dose IV ascorbate suggested reduced mortality in patients with ARDS, although trials in sepsis have failed to show clinical benefit.

Research question: Does IV high-dose ascorbate improve outcomes in patients with sepsis at risk of or with ARDS?

Study design and methods: In this phase 2b multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trial, patients with known or suspected infection and either shock or acute hypoxemic respiratory failure were randomized to ascorbate (50 mg/kg IV every 6 hours for 5 days) or a matching placebo. The primary outcome was days alive and free of respiratory, renal, and circulatory organ support to day 28. Secondary outcomes included clinical and biological end points.

Results: After enrolling 79 participants, the trial was terminated because of the publication of a separate study of septic shock reporting increased mortality with ascorbate. In the current study, days free of organ support were not different for patients receiving ascorbate compared with those receiving placebo: mean (SD), 20.5 (9.5) days vs 19.0 (10.8) days, respectively (P = .528). The 90-day all-cause mortality was 15% in the ascorbate group vs 33% in the placebo group (P = .057). This was 1 of 19 secondary end points. Soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 levels were reduced in the ascorbate group vs placebo from baseline to both day 2 (median, -861 pg/mL [interquartile range (IQR), -3,043 to 128.9 pg/mL] vs 241.4 pg/mL [-820 to 1,671 pg/mL]; P…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 79 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free