Evidence Hub

Biomarkers trajectories in critically ill patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome: insights from latent class growth analysis

Madotto F, Ferrari F, Florio G, Guzzardella A, Carlesso E, Calfee CS, Delucchi K, Scaravilli V et al.

BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common condition requiring intensive care, with limited effective treatments due to its clinical and biological heterogeneity. Efforts in critical care medicine have identified ARDS sub-phenotypes, hyperinflammatory and hypoinflammatory, which suggest underlying heterogeneity in patient responses. Studies have detected a low prevalence of the hyperinflammatory phenotype in ARDS patients related to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). To identify targeted therapeutic interventions, this study applied growth mixture models to longitudinal biomarker data to determine specific latent trajectory groups. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a cohort study on patients with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to an Italian intensive care unit (ICU) with at least two assessments of inflammatory marker levels within 28 days of admission. Plasma levels of interleukin 6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), soluble tumour necrosis factor receptor 1 (sTNFR-1), intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE) and angiopoietin-2 (Ang2) were assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were analysed, with a total of 201 level assessments performed. None showed hyperinflammatory phenotype within 48 h of ICU admission. Latent class growth analysis identified distinct trajectories for sTNFR-1, ICAM-1, and sRAGE, with sTNFR-1 class 1 including 39.7% of patients showing elevated levels escalating…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free