Evidence Hub

Machine learning empowered formulation design, optimization and characterization of nanoparticulate drug delivery systems: Current applications, challenges, and future perspectives

Shen C, Zhang M, Lu M, Chang E, Gao Z, Ban W, Liu Q, Zuo Z et al.

Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B, 2026

22 citations

Abstract

Nanoparticulate drug delivery systems (NDDS) have revolutionized modern medicine by significantly improving drug targeting, bioavailability, and therapeutic efficacy. Despite the clinical success of over 90 approved nanomedicines, the development of NDDS remains challenging due to the complexity of formulation design, optimization, and characterization processes. Artificial intelligence, particularly machine learning (ML), offers powerful data analytics and predictive capabilities that can address these challenges. This review systematically summarizes recent advances in ML applications across various NDDS formulations, including polymeric nanoparticles, lipid nanoparticles, liposomes, solid lipid nanoparticles, nanostructured lipid carriers, nanoemulsions, nanosuspensions, lipid-based hybrid NDDS, self-emulsifying drug delivery systems, niosomes, and nanocrystals. We also summarize how ML algorithms could help predict critical quality attributes of NDDS, such as particle size, shape, surface properties, drug encapsulation efficiency, drug loading efficiency, drug release behavior, and stability. Furthermore, we discuss existing challenges and prospects for the formulation development empowered by ML in NDDS. In conclusion, this review provides a comprehensive overview of the transformative potential of ML in improving the formulation development of nanomedicines, ultimately accelerating their clinical translation.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a review, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free