Evidence Hub

Prognostic significance of novel muscle quality index utilization in hospitalized adults with cancer: A secondary analysis

J. P. da Costa Pereira, C. M. Prado, M. C. Gonzalez, P. Cabral, Francisco F. de Oliveira Guedes, A. da Silva Diniz, A. P. T. Fayh

JPEN - Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 2024

75 participants · 7 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate and propose novel approaches to calculate muscle quality index (MQI) using muscle mass derived from single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (SF-BIA) and calf circumference in both unadjusted and body mass index (BMI)-adjusted forms. In addition, we examined their prognostic significance in patients with cancer.

METHODS

A secondary analysis was conducted on a prospective cohort study of patients with cancer. Handgrip strength was measured. SF-BIA was conducted to estimate appendicular lean soft tissue (ALST, in kilograms). MQI was calculated using three approaches: (1) the ratio of handgrip strength to ALST (MQISF-BIA), (2) the ratio of handgrip strength to calf circumference (MQIcalf circumference), and (3) the ratio of handgrip strength to BMI-adjusted calf circumference (MQIadj. calf circumference). Maximally selected log-rank was calculated to estimate their cutoff values to predict survival.

RESULTS

Two hundred eighty-four patients were included (51.1% men; median age, 61 years). Solid tumors were the most frequent (89.8%). All approaches to MQI (MQISF-BIA, MQIcalf circumference, and MQIadj. calf circumference) were independent predictors of 6-month mortality. The found cutoffs were (1) MQISF-BIA (<1.52 for men, <0.63 for women), (2) MQIcalf circumference (<0.74 for men, <0.24 for women), and (3) MQIadj. calf circumference (<0.75 for men, <0.25 for women).

CONCLUSION

This study introduces MQISF-BIA, MQIcalf…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 75 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free