Evidence Hub

CT Findings of Thoracic Paravertebral Lesions in IgG4-Related Disease

Inoue D, Zen Y, Komori T, Yoshida K, Yoneda N, Kitao A, Kozaka K, Izumozaki A et al.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 2019

30 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to characterize the CT findings of IgG4-related paravertebral lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We selected cases of IgG4-related paravertebral lesions that satisfied two inclusion criteria: first, lesions in patients with IgG4-related disease diagnosed by a multidisciplinary approach between April 2007 and June 2018; and, second, patients who had soft-tissue lesions in paravertebral regions on CT images. We added one case of an IgG4-related paravertebral lesion diagnosed pathologically in 2003. Finally, the study consisted of 30 patients (25 men and five women; median age, 69.5 years). We retrospectively evaluated the CT findings of the paravertebral lesions. RESULTS. A total of 31 paravertebral lesions were identified in 30 patients. All lesions were located around thoracic vertebrae, particularly the lower thoracic regions (n = 30). Twenty-six lesions (84%) involved two or more vertebrae in a row. The right side of vertebrae was predominantly affected in all cases except one (30/31 lesions). Radiologically, the paravertebral lesions were characterized as a bandlike, demarcated soft-tissue mass (mean maximum thickness, 8.7 mm) with homogeneous enhancement on late phase images of contrast-enhanced CT. All patients had IgG4-related lesions at other sites. Histologically, paravertebral lesions showed sclerosing inflammation consisting of diffuse lymphoplasmacytic infiltrations with many IgG4-positive plasma cells and irregular fibrosis.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 30 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free