Evidence Hub

Clinical advantage and outcomes of computed tomography-based transvaginal hybrid brachytherapy performed only by sedation without general or saddle block anesthesia

Okonogi N, Murata K, Matsui T, Iwai Y, Mori Y, Kaneko T, Wakatsuki M, Tsuji H

Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2022

54 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional image-guided brachytherapy is the standard of care in cervical cancer radiotherapy. In addition, the usefulness of the so-called "hybrid brachytherapy (HBT)" has been reported, which involves the addition of needle applicators to conventional intracavitary brachytherapy for interstitial irradiation.

AIM: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of CT-based HBT consisting of transvaginal insertion of needle applicators (CT-based transvaginal HBT) and only intravenous sedation without general or saddle block anesthesia.

METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a retrospective chart review of patients who received definitive radiotherapy, including CT-based transvaginal HBT, between February 2012 and July 2019. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (i) histologically diagnosed disease, (ii) untreated cervical cancer, (iii) International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB1-IVA disease in the 2008 FIGO staging system, and (iv) patients who underwent CT-based transvaginal HBT at least once in a series of intracavitary brachytherapy. Overall, 54 patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria in the present study. The median follow-up period was 32 (IQR, 19-44) months. No patient complained of symptoms such as persistent bleeding or abdominal pain after the treatment. The 3-year local control (LC), disease-free survival, and overall survival rates for all 54 patients were 86.6%, 60.3%, and 90.7% (95% CI [81.3%-100.0%]), respectively. The 3-year LC rate…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 54 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free