Evidence Hub

Assessment of SPECT-CT fusion images and semi-quantitative evaluation using SUV in 123I-IMP SPECT in patients with choroidal melanoma

Yamazaki K, Nishii R, Maeda T, Makishima H, Kasuya G, Chang T, Tamura K, Wakatsuki M et al.

Annals of nuclear medicine, 2020

25 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic ability of N-isopropyl-p-[I-123] iodoamphetamine (IMP) SPECT semi-quantitative evaluation based on the standardized uptake value (SUV) in patients with choroidal melanoma. The secondary aim was to investigate the 6-h IMP SPECT imaging in comparison with 24-h imaging.

METHODS: Twenty-five patients (14 males and 11 females, mean age of 59.2-year-old) were analyzed in this retrospective study. Patients underwent 24-h IMP SPECT imaging with a gamma camera after intravenous injection of IMP. Twelve of 25 patients underwent 6-h SPECT imaging in addition to the 24-h imaging. All acquired SPECT images were fused with CT images using an image-analysis software. To assess the utility of semi-quantitative evaluation method, we introduced an image evaluation method using SUVmax comparing with conventional count-based uptake index (UI) evaluation of the lesion. Volumes-of-interest (VOIs) for SUVmax and regions-of-interest (ROIs) for UI were drawn referring to the SPECT-CT fusion image. Then the relationship between the 6- and 24-h images was examined both in SUV and UI evaluation. Furthermore, the relationship between the size category classification (SCC) by UICC/AJCC: 1-4 scales and each semi-quantitative value using SUVmax and UI was also assessed.

RESULTS: SUVmax of the tumor was significantly higher than that of the normal side; 2.37 ± 0.88 and 1.77 ± 0.39 (P < 0.05) on 6-h image, 4.17 ± 1.73 and 2.04 ± 0.45 (P < 0.001)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 25 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free