Evidence Hub

A retrospective study of small-pelvis radiotherapy plus image-guided brachytherapy in stage I-II non-bulky cervical squamous cell carcinoma

Yoshimoto Y, Murata K, Irie D, Ando K, Adachi A, Aoki H, Hirakawa T, Noda SE et al.

Journal of radiation research, 2022

Abstract

We herein report a retrospective analysis of the efficacy of a combination therapy of pelvic irradiation that excluded the common iliac lymph nodes region and image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) for non-bulky (≤4 cm) cervical cancer. Thirty-three patients with stage I-II cervical squamous cell carcinoma (≤4 cm) and without pelvic/para-aortic lymphadenopathy who were treated with definitive radiotherapy alone between February 2009 and September 2016 were included. The radiotherapy consisted of CT-based small-pelvis irradiation (whole pelvis minus common iliac lymph node area) of 20 Gy/10 fractions followed by pelvic irradiation with a midline block of 30 Gy/15 fractions and IGBT of 24 Gy/4 fractions (6 Gy/fraction for high-risk [HR] clinical target volume [CTV] D90%). In-room computed tomography (CT) imaging with applicator insertion was used for brachytherapy planning, with physical examinations and diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) also being referred to for determination of HR CTV. Over a median follow-up of 60.5 months (range, 7-89), two patients developed distant recurrence and one developed local and distant recurrence. Two patients died from cervical cancer, one from hepatocellular carcinoma and one from non-cancerous disease. The 2/5-year local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 100%/96.7%, 93.8%/90.6% and 93.9%/93.9%, respectively. No pelvic/para-aortic lymph node recurrence was observed. There were no late…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free