Evidence Hub

Improvement of the repeatability of parallel transmission at 7T using interleaved acquisition in the calibration scan

Kameda H, Kudo K, Matsuda T, Harada T, Iwadate Y, Uwano I, Yamashita F, Yoshioka K et al.

Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2018

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Respiration-induced phase shift affects B0 /B1+ mapping repeatability in parallel transmission (pTx) calibration for 7T brain MRI, but is improved by breath-holding (BH). However, BH cannot be applied during long scans.

PURPOSE: To examine whether interleaved acquisition during calibration scanning could improve pTx repeatability and image homogeneity.

STUDY TYPE: Prospective.

SUBJECTS: Nine healthy subjects.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 7T MRI with a two-channel RF transmission system was used.

ASSESSMENT: Calibration scanning for B0 /B1+ mapping was performed under sequential acquisition/free-breathing (Seq-FB), Seq-BH, and interleaved acquisition/FB (Int-FB) conditions. The B0 map was calculated with two echo times, and the B1+ map was obtained using the Bloch-Siegert method. Actual flip-angle imaging (AFI) and gradient echo (GRE) imaging were performed using pTx and quadrature-Tx (qTx). All scans were acquired in five sessions. Repeatability was evaluated using intersession standard deviation (SD) or coefficient of variance (CV), and in-plane homogeneity was evaluated using in-plane CV.

STATISTICAL TESTS: A paired t-test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons was used.

RESULTS: The intersession CV/SDs for the B0 /B1+ maps were significantly smaller in Int-FB than in Seq-FB (Bonferroni-corrected P < 0.05 for all). The intersession CVs for the AFI and GRE images were also significantly smaller in Int-FB, Seq-BH, and qTx than in Seq-FB…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free