Evidence Hub

Ultrasonography of IgG4-related dacryoadenitis and sialadenitis: Imaging features and clinical usefulness

Komori T, Inoue D, Izumozaki A, Sugiura T, Terada K, Yoneda N, Toshima F, Yoshida K et al.

Modern rheumatology, 2022

96 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To clarify the ultrasonographic features of immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related dacryoadenitis and sialadenitis (IgG4-DS) and their usefulness in clinical diagnostic sessions.

METHODS: By re-evaluating 96 consecutive patients with IgG4-related disease, we identified 54 patients (male:female = 37:17; median age, 69.5 years) who underwent lacrimal or submandibular gland (LG or SG, respectively) ultrasonography and computed tomography (CT). Their clinical and ultrasonographic features were retrospectively analysed. Radio-pathological correlations were also examined in LG (23 cases) and SG lesions (20 cases). Additionally, the diagnostic accuracy of CT for LG/SG lesions was evaluated.

RESULTS: Abnormal ultrasonographic findings were detected in 33 (LGs) and 38 (SGs) patients, and most of them were observed bilaterally. All lesions were well demarcated and demonstrated diffuse low-echoic areas (rocky pattern) or multiple low-echoic nodules surrounded by high-echoic linear shadows (cobblestone pattern) corresponding to intra-lobular inflammation and inter-lobular fibrosis. Moreover, 42% (LGs; 14/33) and 42% (SGs; 16/38) patients had glandular lesions without clinical symptoms associated with the affected glands. The diagnostic accuracy of CT was ∼80% for LG and 55% for SG.

CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonographic findings in IgG4-DS included diffuse or nodular low-echoic areas with linear high-echoic structures corresponding to inflamed lobules and inter-lobular fibrosis. These…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 96 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free