Evidence Hub

Markers of Left Atrial Myopathy: Prognostic Usefulness for Ischemic Stroke and Dementia in People in Sinus Rhythm

Masini G, Wang W, Ji Y, Eaton A, Inciardi RM, Soliman EZ, Passman RS, Solomon SD et al.

Stroke, 2025

4,712 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Various measures of abnormal left atrial (LA) structure or function (LA myopathy) are associated with a higher risk of ischemic stroke and dementia, independent of atrial fibrillation. However, limited data exist on their prognostic usefulness. Therefore, we aimed to assess the ability of markers of LA myopathy to improve the prediction of ischemic stroke and dementia.

METHODS: The ARIC study (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) is a prospective community-based cohort study. For this analysis, we included participants who attended visit 5 (2011-2013) without a history of stroke or atrial fibrillation and had a 12-lead ECG and a transthoracic echocardiogram. Markers of LA myopathy included P wave abnormalities from 12-lead ECG, NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide), and LA volume and strain parameters from the echocardiogram. The primary composite outcome comprised ischemic stroke and dementia, which were ascertained through hospital surveillance, cohort follow-up, and death registries. To determine improvement in risk prediction of the composite outcome, each marker was individually added to a model that included CHA2DS2-VASc variables, and Akaike information criterion, C statistic, and its change were computed. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the independent association of LA myopathy markers with the outcome.

RESULTS: Among 4712 participants (59% female; mean age, 74 years), 193 ischemic strokes and 769 dementia cases were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 4,712 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free