Evidence Hub

A study design for statistical learning technique to predict radiological progression with an application of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis using chest CT images

Kim GHJ, Shi Y, Yu W, Wong WK

Contemporary clinical trials, 2021

122 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a fatal interstitial lung disease characterized by an unpredictable decline in lung function. Predicting IPF progression from the early changes in lung function tests have known to be a challenge due to acute exacerbation. Although it is unpredictable, the neighboring regions of fibrotic reticulation increase during IPF's progression. With this clinical information, quantitative characteristics of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and a statistical learning paradigm, the aim is to build a model to predict IPF progression.

DESIGN: A paired set of anonymized 193 HRCT images from IPF subjects with 6-12 month intervals were collected retrospectively. The study was conducted in two parts: (1) Part A collects the ground truth in small regions of interest (ROIs) with labels of "expected to progress" or "expected to be stable" at baseline HRCT and develop a statistical learning model to classify voxels in the ROIs. (2) Part B uses the voxel-level classifier from Part A to produce whole-lung level scores of a single-scan total probability's (STP) baseline.

METHODS: Using annotated ROIs from 71 subjects' HRCT scans in Part A, we applied Quantum Particle Swarm Optimization-Random Forest (QPSO-RF) to build the classifier. Then, 122 subjects' HRCT scans were used to test the prediction. Using Spearman rank correlations and survival analyses, we ascertained STP associations with 6-12 month changes in quantitative lung fibrosis…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 122 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free