Evidence Hub

Choroidal Osteoma: Case Series

A. Aubakirova, Kamilya Sarsembekova, Zaure Jumatayeva, Z. Utelbayeva, Zh. E. Serikova, Dinara Berlibek

Case Reports in Medicine, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Purpose To describe the clinical presentation, multimodal imaging findings, and management of patients with choroidal osteoma observed at a tertiary ophthalmic center. Methods A retrospective case series of three patients (four affected eyes) diagnosed with choroidal osteoma at the Kazakh Eye Research Institute, Almaty, Kazakhstan. All patients underwent a comprehensive ophthalmic examination, including best‐corrected visual acuity assessment, fundus photography, B‐scan ultrasonography, optical coherence tomography (OCT), fluorescein angiography (FA), OCT angiography, and computed tomography (CT). Results The patients presented with decreased vision, progressive visual impairment, or vitreous floaters. Choroidal osteoma was identified as a yellowish‐white or orange peripapillary subretinal lesion with well‐defined borders. Multimodal imaging demonstrated characteristic calcified choroidal lesions with high acoustic reflectivity on ultrasonography, hyperdense plaques on CT, and hyperreflective heterogeneous structures on OCT corresponding to cancellous bone architecture. None of the patients demonstrated active choroidal neovascularization at presentation. Associated systemic or inflammatory conditions included systemic lupus erythematosus, retinal vasculitis, and chronic infectious exposure. All patients were managed conservatively with regular follow‐up because of the absence of severe complications requiring intervention. Conclusions Choroidal osteoma is a rare benign…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free