Evidence Hub

Sonographic diagnosis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma to the head and neck region

Issing PR, Stöver T, Kempf HG, Heermann R, Lenarz T

Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany : 1980), 1999

Abstract

In the area of the head and neck metastases from distant primary tumours are rare in comparison to the common squamous cell carcinomas of the upper respiratory and digestive tract. Thus correct preoperative diagnosis may be difficult. Two cases with distant metastases of renal cell carcinoma to the head and neck region are presented in this report. In a 60-year-old male patient, diagnostic evaluation of unilateral epistaxis revealed a radioopacity of the maxillary sinus, six months after removal of a renal cell carcinoma. In the second case a slowly progressive indolent swelling of the left neck developed in a 56-year-old man six years after resection of a renal cell carcinoma and two years after surgical treatment of a pancreatic carcinoma. Following clinical examination, modern imaging techniques with special emphasis on colour Doppler sonography with a Siemens Quantum 2000 were used for diagnostic evaluation in both patients. Sonography of metastatic renal cell carcinoma to the maxillary sinus revealed complete opacity of the antrum. The cervical mass proved to the inhomogeneous and hypoechogenic and was difficult to distinguish from the lower parotid lobe and the vessel sheath. A common feature of both tumours was a high degree of perfusion which could be confirmed by superselective angiography. The histological examination of the surgical specimen showed an isolated metastasis of a renal cell carcinoma in both cases. In patients with a history of renal cell carcinoma…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free