Evidence Hub

Ruptured Basilar Artery Perforator Aneurysm Definitely Diagnosed with Intraoperative Microsurgical Findings: Case Report and Literature Review

Takahiro Kumagawa, Naoki Otani, Yuzo Kakei, H. Negishi, T. Suma, A. Yoshino

NMC Case Report Journal, 2023

4 citations

Abstract

Initial three-dimensional computed tomography and cerebral angiography fail to identify any aneurysm in 20% of cases of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Basilar artery (BA) perforator aneurysms are rare, and approximately 30%-60% were not identified by initial angiography. A 71-year-old male was transferred with a sudden onset of headache and loss of consciousness. Computed tomography demonstrated subarachnoid hemorrhage, but no ruptured aneurysm was detected. Repeat preoperative cerebral angiography indicated a bifurcation aneurysm of the circumflex branch of the superior cerebellar artery perforator, but microsurgical observation identified the BA perforator aneurysm. If the location of the BA perforator aneurysm cannot be clearly identified, as in this case, repeat angiography should be considered, and the treatment strategy should be decided based on a detailed consideration of the site of the aneurysm.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free