Evidence Hub

Intracranial Idiopathic Acute Epidural Hematoma Presenting with a Stroke-like Attack and Rapid Neurological Deterioration: A Case Report

Yuta Koketsu, Takafumi Tanei, T. Kato, Takehiro Naito, K. Okada, Risa Ito, Kento Hirayama, T. Hasegawa

NMC Case Report Journal, 2022

5 citations

Abstract

A 36-year-old woman presented with sudden onset of a right-sided headache that awoke her from sleep. She had no episodes of trauma or abuse. She was initially able to speak, but fell into a coma within an hour. The right pupil was dilated, with slow pupillary reflexes to light on both sides, and she showed left hemiparalysis. Computed tomography scan showed a right acute epidural hematoma, approximately 4 cm in thickness, and there were no findings of trauma such as skin wounds, subcutaneous hematomas, or skull fractures. In the emergency room, decompression of intracranial pressure by one burr hole was performed, and her dilated right pupil improved to normal size. She was then moved to the operating room, and hematoma removal was performed by craniotomy. Her blood pressure trended downward despite rapid blood transfusion and vasopressor therapy. There were no abnormal findings apparent intraoperatively, except for oozing from the whole surface of the dura mater and epidural space. Her consciousness improved postoperatively, and her left hemiparalysis improved within a few days. No causative diseases, risk factors, or vascular abnormalities were found on laboratory and radiological surveys. Two months postoperatively, the bone flap was removed because of infection. Eight months postoperatively, a cranioplasty using artificial skull was performed, and her postoperative course was uneventful. One year after the initial surgery, she has no neurological deficits, and there has…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free