Evidence Hub

Fatal Fungal Aneurysm Rupture Due to Aspergillosis after Craniopharyngioma Removal via Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery: Case Report and Comparison with Seven Reported Patients

M. Kusumi, H. Oka, H. Kimura, Hitoshi Yamazaki, Koji Kondo, T. Kumabe

NMC Case Report Journal, 2022

6 citations

Abstract

There has been a noted increase in the incidence of intracranial aspergillosis; this is often attributed to the wider use of antibiotics, corticosteroids, and immunosuppressants. Fungal cerebral aneurysms due to aspergillosis after neurosurgery remain extremely rare; in fact, only seven cases have been reported in the literature. In this study, we present a patient with an Aspergillus aneurysm that elicited subarachnoid hemorrhage after endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) for craniopharyngioma. A 70-year-old woman with recurrent craniopharyngioma and steroid treatment underwent uneventful EES. On the 5th postoperative day, she suffered subarachnoid hemorrhage. As per her computed tomography angiography findings, an aneurysm was detected on the left internal carotid artery (ICA). Subsequent digital subtraction angiography showed occlusion of the ICA and an irregularly shaped wall. The diagnosis was pseudoaneurysm. We then performed craniotomy to place a left high-flow bypass and to trap the pseudoaneurysm. Despite continuous intensive care, she died on the 25th postoperative day of a huge, left cerebral infarct. The final diagnosis was made at autopsy; it revealed destruction of the ICA and Aspergillus invasion of the vessel wall, confirming the presence of a true fungal aneurysm. Perioperatively, patients with potential immunosuppression must be carefully managed. Advanced age is a risk factor. As surgery via the paranasal sinuses raises the risk for aspergillosis, fungal…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free