Evidence Hub

Pleuritis associated with immunoglobulin G4-related disease under normal thoracoscopic findings: a case report

Hiroki Shimada, Yuto Kato, M. Okuda, K. Fukuda, N. Tanaka, Y. Okuda, A. Yoshizawa

Journal of Medical Case Reports, 2021

18 citations

Abstract

Background Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related disease is a chronic inflammatory disease that was recognized in 2011. Pleuritis associated with IgG4-related disease is rare and can be difficult to diagnose. Although there have been previous reports on pleuritis associated with IgG4-related disease by thoracoscopic findings, this is the first to observe pleuritis with IgG4-related disease from normal pleural thoracoscopic findings. Case presentation A 70-year-old Japanese female treated for breast cancer 33 years ago was referred to our hospital complaining of dyspnea on exertion. Chest computed tomography (CT) revealed left pleural effusion that was exudative and predominant with lymphocytes, elevated adenosine deaminase (ADA) and Class III cytology (malignancy suspected). Subsequently, thoracoscopic pleural biopsy was performed for definitive diagnosis. Although pleural macroscopic findings appeared normal, we performed pleural biopsy at random sites. This patient was negative for mycobacterium tuberculosis, and neither granulomas nor malignant cells were found in the collected specimens. An infiltration of inflammatory cells, mainly plasma cells and lymphocytes, was observed. Immunostaining revealed the number of IgG4-positive plasma cells was 102/high power field (HPF), and the percentage of IgG4 positive/immunoglobulin G (IgG)-positive cells was 41.4%. Since IgG4 serum levels were high and IgG4-related submandibular sialadenitis was also observed, a definitive diagnose of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free