Evidence Hub

Protein Molecular Dynamics Simulations with Approximate QM: What Can We Learn?

Irle S, Vuong VQ, Elayyan MH, Talipov MR, Abel SM

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2020

Abstract

Classical force fields are essential for computer simulations of proteins and are typically parameterized to reproduce secondary and tertiary structure of isolated proteins. However, while protein-protein interactions are ubiquitous in nature, they are not considered in parameterization efforts and are far less understood than isolated proteins. A better characterization of intermolecular interactions is widely recognized as a key to revolutionizing drug and therapeutic developments with high-throughput computational screening. Urgently needed is a critical assessment of the performance of modern protein force fields against first-principles electronic structure methods and experiments. In a daring step toward this goal, we here describe a comparison of peptide folding dynamics as predicted by a molecular mechanics force field on the one hand and by an approximate electronic structure quantum mechanical (QM) method based on density-functional tight-binding (DFTB) on the other. We further compare the dynamics from straightforward DFTB simulations with a near-linear scaling version of DFTB for massively parallel computation based on the fragment molecular orbital (FMO-DFTB) method. We illustrate differences between the phenomenology of the folding dynamics from these three methods for a small model peptide, as well as charge polarization and dynamic fluctuations, point out possible correlations and implications for force field developers, and discuss the lessons learned that…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a review, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free