Evidence Hub

Systems-Level Support for Hybrid Quantum-Classical Learning: A Systematic Review with a Medical Imaging Translation Lens

Rahman M, Paul PC, Begum A, Sultana K, Akter N, Majumder A, Zhu M, Sheng Z et al.

Journal of imaging, 2026

Abstract

Hybrid quantum-classical learning pipelines combine conventional accelerators, quantum runtimes, and quantum processing units (QPUs), creating scheduling, memory, isolation, encoding, and deployment challenges that are not captured by application-level quantum machine learning surveys alone. This paper presents a systematic review of runtime and systems mechanisms for hybrid quantum-classical workloads, with medical imaging used as a translation lens rather than as an exclusive inclusion boundary. Following a PRISMA-aligned review process, we screened 364 records and synthesized 40 studies published between 2020 and 2025. Each study was coded by systems layer, application grounding, noisy-label relevance, and evaluation maturity. The coding shows that the corpus combines direct medical evidence with broader transferable systems evidence: 8 studies directly evaluated medical data, 12 were medically motivated, and 20 were generic systems studies. Across the corpus, the strongest support concerns hybrid orchestration, qubit/resource allocation, classical-quantum data movement, and container-based reproducibility, whereas evidence remains limited for realistic clinical operation, end-to-end remote-QPU workflows, multi-tenant isolation, and noisy-label retraining loops. We contribute an evidence map, a direct/indirect/interpretive evidence distinction, and cross-layer design guidelines for future hybrid quantum-classical imaging pipelines in regulated settings.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free