Current status and future developments in predicting outcomes in radiation oncology
Abstract
Advancements in data-driven technologies and the inclusion of information-rich multiomics features have significantly improved the performance of outcomes modeling in radiation oncology. For this current trend to be sustainable, challenges related to robust data modeling such as small sample size, low size to feature ratio, noisy data, as well as issues related to algorithmic modeling such as complexity, uncertainty, and interpretability, need to be mitigated if not resolved. Emerging computational technologies and new paradigms such as federated learning, human-in-the-loop, quantum computing, and novel interpretability methods show great potential in overcoming these challenges and bridging the gap towards precision outcome modeling in radiotherapy. Examples of these promising technologies will be presented and their potential role in improving outcome modeling will be discussed.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a review, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.
Read the paper
Related studies
- In silico toxicology protocols
- QM7-X, a comprehensive dataset of quantum-mechanical properties spanning the chemical space of small organic molecules
- Quantum Informed Machine-Learning Potentials for Molecular Dynamics Simulations of CO2's Chemisorption and Diffusion in Mg-MOF-74
- In-silico strategies in nano-drug design: Bridging nanomaterials and pharmacological applications
- mRNA codon optimization with quantum computers
- The computational power of the human brain
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.