Avoidance of the Ames test liability for aryl-amines via computation
Abstract
Aryl-amines are commonly used synthons in modern drug discovery, however a minority of these chemical templates have the potential to cause toxicity through mutagenicity. The toxicity mostly arises through a series of metabolic steps leading to a reactive electrophilic nitrenium cation intermediate that reacts with DNA nucleotides causing mutation. Highly detailed in silico calculations of the energetics of chemical reactions involved in the metabolic formation of nitrenium cations have been performed. This allowed a critical assessment of the accuracy and reliability of using a theoretical formation energy of the DNA-reactive nitrenium intermediate to correlate with the Ames test response. This study contains the largest data set reported to date, and presents the in silico calculations versus the in vitro Ames response data in the form of beanplots commonly used in statistical analysis. A comparison of this quantum mechanical approach to QSAR and knowledge-based methods is also reported, as well as the calculated formation energies of nitrenium ions for thousands of commercially available aryl-amines generated as a watch-list for medicinal chemists in their synthetic optimization strategies.
Read the paper
Related studies
- In silico toxicology protocols
- QM7-X, a comprehensive dataset of quantum-mechanical properties spanning the chemical space of small organic molecules
- Quantum Informed Machine-Learning Potentials for Molecular Dynamics Simulations of CO2's Chemisorption and Diffusion in Mg-MOF-74
- In-silico strategies in nano-drug design: Bridging nanomaterials and pharmacological applications
- mRNA codon optimization with quantum computers
- The computational power of the human brain
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.