Evidence Hub

Carbon-13 NMR shielding in the twenty common amino acids: comparisons with experimental results in proteins

Sun H, Sanders LK, Oldfield E

Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2002

Abstract

We have used ab initio quantum chemical techniques to compute the (13)C(alpha) and (13)C(beta) shielding surfaces for the 14 amino acids not previously investigated (R. H. Havlin et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 11951-11958) in their most popular conformations. The spans (Omega = sigma(33) - sigma(11)) of all the tensors reported here are large ( approximately 34 ppm) and there are only very minor differences between helical and sheet residues. This is in contrast to the previous report in which Val, Ile and Thr were reported to have large ( approximately 12 ppm) differences in Omega between helical and sheet geometries. Apparently, only the beta-branched (beta-disubstituted) amino acids have such large CSA span (Omega) differences; however, there are uniformly large differences in the solution-NMR-determined CSA (Deltasigma = sigma(orth) - sigma(par)) between helices and sheets in all amino acids considered. This effect is overwhelmingly due to a change in shielding tensor orientation. With the aid of such shielding tensor orientation information, we computed Deltasigma values for all of the amino acids in calmodulin/M13 and ubiquitin. For ubiquitin, we find only a 2.7 ppm rmsd between theory and experiment for Deltasigma over an approximately 45 ppm range, a 0.96 slope, and an R(2) = 0.94 value when using an average solution NMR structure. We also report C(beta) shielding tensor results for these same amino acids, which reflect the small isotropic chemical shift…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a experimental / empirical study, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free