Evidence Hub

ISiCLE: A Quantum Chemistry Pipeline for Establishing in Silico Collision Cross Section Libraries

S. Colby, Dennis G. Thomas, Jamie R. Nuñez, D. Baxter, K. Glaesemann, Joseph Brown, Meg Pirrung, N. Govind et al.

Analytical Chemistry, 2019

112 citations

Abstract

High-throughput, comprehensive, and confident identifications of metabolites and other chemicals in biological and environmental samples will revolutionize our understanding of the role these chemically diverse molecules play in biological systems. Despite recent technological advances, metabolomics studies still result in the detection of a disproportionate number of features that cannot be confidently assigned to a chemical structure. This inadequacy is driven by the single most significant limitation in metabolomics, the reliance on reference libraries constructed by analysis of authentic reference materials with limited commercial availability. To this end, we have developed the in silico chemical library engine (ISiCLE), a high-performance computing-friendly cheminformatics workflow for generating libraries of chemical properties. In the instantiation described here, we predict probable three-dimensional molecular conformers (i.e., conformational isomers) using chemical identifiers as input, from which collision cross sections (CCS) are derived. The approach employs first-principles simulation, distinguished by the use of molecular dynamics, quantum chemistry, and ion mobility calculations, to generate structures and chemical property libraries, all without training data. Importantly, optimization of ISiCLE included a refactoring of the popular MOBCAL code for trajectory-based mobility calculations, improving its computational efficiency by over 2 orders of magnitude.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a simulation / modelling, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free