Evidence Hub

In silico approach towards nanostructuring of dysprosium bis(amide)-alkene based single-ion magnet onto 1D, 2D, and 3D Network

Kusum Kumari, S. K. Singh

Physical Chemistry, Chemical Physics - PCCP, 2026

Abstract

Single-ion magnets (SIMs) are promising candidates for molecular spintronics and quantum technologies; however, their integration into functional nanostructures remains a significant challenge. In this work, we present a comprehensive theoretical investigation of a high-performance dysprosium bis(amide)-alkene complex, [Dy{N(SiiPr3)[SiiPr2C(CH3) = CHCH3]}{N(SiiPr3)(SiiPr2Et)}]+ (1), embedded in three distinct environments: a one-dimensional (1D) carbon nanotube (CNT(20,0)), a two-dimensional (2D) Au(111) surface, and the three-dimensional (3D) porous framework MOF-177. By combining periodic density functional theory (pDFT) and CASSCF-SO calculations, we elucidate the influence of dimensionality on SIM behavior across these assemblies. pDFT calculations predict binding energies of -236.5, -109.1, and -68.7 kcal mol-1 for 1@CNT, 1@Au(111), and 1@MOF-177, respectively, while structural analysis reveals that the molecular geometry remains largely preserved upon incorporation. CASSCF-SO results performed on DFT optimized geometry show stabilization of the |±15/2〉 ground state with near-ideal Ising-type anisotropy (gzz ≈ 19.98-19.99) in all cases. The computed ab initio barrier heights (Ucal) are 1564.3, 1525.5, and 1904.9 cm-1 for 1@CNT, 1@MOF-177, and 1@Au(111), respectively, which is close to the Ucal value of 1820.4 cm-1 observed for 1. Notably, deposition of 1 on Au(111) leads to the opening of the ∠N-Dy-N bond angle, increasing the magnetic anisotropy barrier, and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a simulation / modelling, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free