Evidence Hub

Molecular Iodine-Catalyzed Synthesis of Imidazo[1,2-a]Pyridines: Screening of Their In Silico Selectivity, Binding Affinity to Biological Targets, and Density Functional Theory Studies Insight

Deepika Geedkar, Ashok Kumar, Pratibha Sharma

ACS Omega, 2022

11 citations

Abstract

The present paper discloses an ultrasonication strategy assisted by molecular iodine as an environmentally benign catalyst leading to the synthesis of pharmacologically significant imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine scaffolds. The molecular-iodine-catalyzed approach for the synthesis of biologically active synthetic equivalents was achieved through three-component coupling embracing 2-aminopyridine derivatives, pertinent acetophenones, and dimedone in water medium under aerobic conditions. The higher product yield (up to 96%) with a miniature reaction time and modest catalyst loading as demonstrated by higher ecological compatibility and sustainability factors are fascinating features of this protocol. The structures of synthesized compounds were accomplished through FT-IR, 1H NMR,13C NMR, mass, and elemental analysis data. The virtual screening of synthetic moieties was performed to ascertain the in silico selectivity and binding affinities against several biological targets. Lipinski’s rules of five, ADMET, and TOPKAT descriptors were used to evaluate the drug-likeness assets. Furthermore, a quantum computational study was computed at the B3LYP/6-311G++(d,p) level of theory to investigate the density functional theory-based chemical reactivity parameters and HOMO–LUMO energy gap of the synthesized derivatives. The present studies open the way for in vitro and in vivo testing of synthesized derivatives as potent inhibitors with an improved pharmacological profile against farnesyl…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a simulation / modelling, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free