Evidence Hub

Chemical Understanding with Machine Learning and Quantum Computers

Shubin Liu

2026

Abstract

Chemical understanding in the twenty-first century is being reshaped by two transformative technologies: machine learning (ML) and quantum computing (QC). Building on the historical foundations of orbital-based and density-based frameworks, this chapter examines how these emerging paradigms address—and transcend—Dirac's dilemma: the tension between known physical laws and the practical intractability of solving the Schrödinger equation. We first outline the limitations of traditional in silico simulations and clarify the distinction between computation and understanding. ML is then presented as a new many-to-many framework capable of predicting chemical properties, discovering latent reactivity patterns, and revealing data-driven abstractions through feature-based representations. QC, in turn, offers a quantum-native route to simulating many-body systems, potentially enabling exact solutions of electronic structure problems at scale. We analyze the ontological and epistemological implications of these developments and propose a unified scheme for harvesting chemical understanding across four theoretical paradigms—wavefunction theory, density functional theory, ML, and QC—each defined by its own fundamental variable (orbitals, electron density, features, and qubits). Finally, we introduce hierarchical modeling as a successor to multiscale modeling, arguing that the integration of ML and QC within a hierarchical, concept-driven modeling framework provides a powerful new route…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a simulation / modelling, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free